On the first anniversary of the explosion of the port of Beirut, large-scale demonstrations took place in front of the Lebanese parliament with the participation of a number of protesters, including “civil society”. Prior to the demonstrations, several campaigns had been launched focusing on the fact that August 4 should be a special day in terms of putting pressure on the government and all politicians.
Experts and analysts believe that the tanker war in the Persian Gulf and the resurgence of armed elements in Daraa and the invasion of southern Lebanon and the sedition of the city of Khalda before August 4 and the events in Beirut are part of a series of conspiracy scenarios in the region, according to the Saudi Foreign Minister his invitation to Lebanese political groups to confront Hezbollah has been completed. He described Hezbollah as the root of the region’s problems, less than two days after the Khalda region ambush plot against Hezbollah forces and Hezbollah’s wise response to the plot.
International relations experts believe that the remarks of Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan against Hezbollah are part of a major conspiracy in the region.
These experts also believe that Hezbollah’s statement, which called for the disclosure of facts about the Beirut port bombing, far from any internal abuses and settlements, will help advance investigations and serve the public interest and help the victims’ families. Because the ambiguity surrounding this research is not in anyone’s interest.
Experts also stating that a delegation from Hezbollah will be sent to Iran to discuss oil and medicine supply says that Nasrallah’s position is quite clear. He believes that when the government does not do its duty, we cannot allow the Lebanese people to suffer for anything, especially fuel oil and medicine. Experts say Hezbollah will make a decisive decision if Najib Mikati fails to form a cabinet.
Political analysts, on the other hand, believe that a year after the disaster in the port of Beirut, the Lebanese government has not yet done anything to identify the real culprits and masterminds of the disaster.
Investigators say that after a year, instead of finding out the truth about the explosion, French and Western newspapers continue to try to blame Hezbollah and the Axis of Resistance.
Analysts fear that the investigation scenario into the Beirut port explosion could also be the fate of Rafiq Hariri’s assassination case. They say that the investigators of the explosion case are going in any direction except where they should go; and they do not ask why this ship came to Lebanon and why they allowed it to enter Lebanon even though they knew what its cargo was, and why not do more research on those who paid for the shipment, especially since it originated in the United States and was paid for in one of the Gulf states. These details can be easily examined without blaming others.
Experts clarify about the international conference, which was held at the invitation of the President of the French Republic “Emmanuel Macron” that the West wants to form a self-governing and opposition-oriented government, especially in Syria, especially in Lebanon, especially since the Western conspiracies against Syria have failed.
Political experts say; the recent demonstrations in Beirut were very impressive; because they were present from all political and civil spectrums and currents.
According to these experts, there were groups with different views and approaches to the demonstrations, and the differences that took place in the “Al-Jimiziya” area between the Communist Party and Lebanese officials, confirm that the participants in the demonstrations were not of the same spectrum and one point of view.
Political experts point out that the government is distributed in Lebanon and the Lebanese people have different tendencies; Some claim sovereignty in order to settle accounts, some try to misuse the event for political and partisan purposes, and some have voluntarily and voluntarily participated, as they were the families of the victims.
Regarding the events on the Lebanese border, political experts say that the nature of the Lebanese government structure is such that there is interference between the internal crisis and the regional crisis, and a series of events take place in the region, including during missile strikes and Israel’s limited response. The axis of resistance has become a deterrent and it is not easy for the occupying regime to embark on an adventure against Hezbollah or Iran. In the wake of these developments, the region has embarked on various developments, including possible military action or attempts at a negotiated settlement.
Political experts point out that some parties and currents in Lebanon are affiliated and supported by the West, but currents and delegations based in the south are allies of Hezbollah, which has nationalist and pro-resistance positions. They stated that there are global plans for Lebanon and to target the resistance and its siege. So the main issue is what the Lebanese and Hezbollah are doing to counter these plans?